NEW CONCLUSIVE STUDIES LINKING WIRELESS RADIATION AND CANCER! !!IMPORTANT!!

CO | Yvonne Nachtigal | 5/10/2018

“EARLY STUDIES ON THE LINK BETWEEN LUNG CANCER AND SMOKING HAD SIMILAR RESISTANCE, SINCE THEORETICAL ARGUMENTS AT THE TIME SUGGESTED THAT THERE COULD NOT BE A LINK .” – American Cancer Society Chief Medical Officer Otis W. Brawley, M.D.

I recently spoke with the office of Kevin Mottus of the California Brain Tumor Trust. Kevin is a California anti-smart meter/5G advocate. His office informed me of TWO NEW CONCLUSIVE STUDIES (March 2018) connecting pulsed/non-ionized radiation (such as that emitted by cell phones and smart meters) and Glioma (brain) and Schwann (heart-rare) cancerous tumors.

PLEASE TAKE TIME TO LOOK THROUGH THESE STUDIES, DOWNLOAD AND SHARE THEM WITH:

DOCTORS
SENATORS
LOCAL OFFICIALS AND REPRESENTATIVES

THEY NEED TO BE MADE AWARE OF THE DANGERS THESE TECHNOLOGIES PRESENT

NATIONAL TOXICOLOTY PROGRAM PEER REVIEWED STUDY – This peer reviewed study cost $25,000,000 to complete and was released in March 2018
- Summary
RAMMAZINI INSTITUTE STUDY – 2018
WIFI STUDIES
AMERICA CANCER SOCIETY STATEMENT
– IN A RECENT ACS PRESS RELEASE IN VIEW OF THE RECENT NTP AND RAMMAZINI STUDIES, American Cancer Society Chief Medical Officer Otis W. Brawley, M.D. , STATED IN PART:

“The NTP report linking radiofrequency radiation (RFR) to two types of cancer marks a paradigm shift in our understanding of radiation and cancer risk. The findings are unexpected; we wouldn’t reasonably expect non-ionizing radiation to cause these tumors. This is a striking example of why serious study is so important in evaluating cancer risk. It’s interesting to note that EARLY STUDIES ON THE LINK BETWEEN LUNG CANCER AND SMOKING HAD SIMILAR RESISTANCE, SINCE THEORETICAL ARGUMENTS AT THE TIME SUGGESTED THAT THERE COULD NOT BE A LINK .” – source – http://pressroom.cancer.org/NTP2016 (emph, caps and red added)

I filed a complaint/appeal over CEMC’s decision to shut off my electricity with the Tennessee Utility Commission. Here is a link to the letter I sent them, which states in part:

“I am appealing CEMC’s decision to illegally shut off my power in lieu of 2016 Tennessee Code / Title 65 – Public Utilities and Carriers / Chapter 4 – Regulation of Public Utilities by Authority / Part 1 – General Provisions / § 65-4-115. Unjust practices and unsafe services prohibited, which states:

“No public utility shall adopt, maintain, or enforce any regulation, practice, or measurement which is unjust, unreasonable, unduly preferential or discriminatory, nor shall any public utility provide or maintain any service that is unsafe, improper, or inadequate, or withhold or refuse any service which can reasonably be demanded and furnished when ordered by the authority.
[Acts 1919, ch. 49, § 6; Shan. Supp., § 3059a89; Code 1932, § 5452; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 65-422; Acts 1993, ch. 23, § 1; T.C.A., § 65-4-114; Acts 1995, ch. 305, § 20.] “

CEMC has failed to provide any proof that PULSED RADIATION EMITTING smart meters are safe.”…