Israel’s policy of “covert aggression” has been reborn as false flag terror, and all Westerners are being put in the position of “persecuted” Jews.
“Our State marching along the path of peaceful [i.e, world] conquest has the right to replace the horrors of war by less notable and more satisfactory sentences of death necessary to maintain the terror which tends to produce blind submission.” (Protocols of Zion, 1:24)
After the Charlie Hebdo attack in January, I revisited this 2002 official reminder
that the Israeli government killed Israelis in “terror attacks” to create “an external threat,” like “anti Semitism” in order to marshal support and justify aggression.
This consistent strategy is employed in the West today to justify war between Christians
and Muslims and the creation of a massive police state “protection” racket.
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
(Originally, “The Zionist Roots of the War on Terror”)
(Updated from Nov 18, 2002)
Until about 2002, I accepted Israel’s self-image as a beleaguered, peace-loving nation in a sea of bloodthirsty Arabs. The idea that this tiny state had imperialist designs seemed ludicrous.
But what if, unknown to most people, Israel were a linchpin in the Illuminati’s plan for New World Order?
What if Israel’s role were to colonize the Middle East, and the West, and to become a seat of the world government & religion?
“Israel’s Sacred Terrorism” (1980) by Livia Rokach, a 63-page on line monograph suggests that this bizarre scenario may be true.
Rokach’s monograph is based on revelations from the personal diary of Moshe Sharett, Israeli’s first Foreign Minister from 1948-1956, and Prime Minister from 1954-1956.
According to this diary which the Israelis tried to suppress, Israel’s image of vulnerability was a ruse. Israel has always planned to become the dominant power in the region, and “invented dangers” in order to provoke wars and dupe its citizens into fighting them.
In his diary, Sharett quotes a conversation with Army Chief of Staff Moshe Dayan in May 1955:
“We face no danger at all of an Arab advantage of force for the next 8-10 years…Reprisal actions which we couldn’t carry out if we were tied to a security pact are our vital lymph…they make it possible for us to maintain a high level of tension in our population and in the army. Without these actions we would have ceased to be a combative people… “
Sharett concludes: “The state…. must see the sword as the main if not the only instrument with which to keep its morale high and to retain its moral tension. Toward this end it may — no it MUST — invent dangers, and to do this it must adopt the method of provocation and revenge…. And above all, let us hope for a new war with the Arab countries so that we may finally get rid of our troubles and acquire our space.” (41)
This policy of “reprisals” or “provocation and revenge” was also called “covert aggression.” The series of false flag terror events we are experiencing is a continuation of it. Essentially it involves disguising a policy of aggression as retaliation for sham provocations. (Except now the aggression takes the form of “anti terror” policies to justify a police state, and war against a manufactured enemy “Islamic terrorism.”)
For example, Israeli patrols would cross the border to attack Jordanians or Egyptians, and then claim the actions were attacks on Israel. Once “attacked,” the army had to pursue the “aggressors” into enemy territory and wreaked havoc. Ariel Sharon was the leader of a squad (“Unit 101”) that specialized in these murderous forays. His 1953 raid on the Jordanian village of Kibiyah killed dozens of civilians. (p.30)
In March 1954, an Israeli bus traveling between Eilat and Beersheba was attacked and 10 passengers were killed. The UN armistice Commissioner, a Col. Henderson said, “from the testimonies of the survivors, it is not proved that all the murderers were Arabs.” He attributed the attack to “terrorists intent on increasing the tensions in the area.” (28) Thereupon the Israelis left the Armistice Commission in protest.
In June-July 1954 an Israeli terrorist squad blew up many British and American institutions in Cairo in an attempt to sour relations between the Arabs and the West. Dubbed the “Lavon Affair,” this was a precursor to the attack on the World Trade Centre and the current era of false flag terror.
From the point of view of “covert aggression”, if terrorism didn’t exist, Israel would have to create it.
Israeli commentators lament that Israel is not a democracy. They say the security establishment has hijacked the country. One pundit remarked, “Israel is not a state with an army, but an army with an affiliated state.” They also lament that a culture of corruption, brutality and immorality pervades the army. See Ran Ha-Cohen, “Israeli Elections. So What”
THE USES OF ANTI SEMITISM
The Illuminati has always used anti-Semitism to trick Jews into advancing its nefarious goals.
In the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” the speaker confesses that they have “wiped out every kind of rule except our own.” Nevertheless they allow “anti Semitic” attacks on its plan for world domination in order to foster anti Semitism. “Anti Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren.” (9-2)
From childhood, Jews are taught that they are disliked for no rational reason and Israel is insurance against another holocaust. This attitude dehumanizes their opponents and obviates the need for genuine self-criticism.
Traumatizing people and convincing them that irrational fiends threaten their survival is an effective form of mind control. Such people will throw morality and reason to the wind and, if necessary, become savage, mindless killers themselves. They are easily exploited and assist in their destruction.
Now the Illuminati is using this tactic on Westerners in general, with the collaboration of Zionist-controlled governments and media. The Mossad’s fingerprints are all over 9-11. Apparently, Israel’s Zim Container Lines moved their 200-man office out of the WTC two weeks before and no Israelis died in the attack. Seven of the 9-11 hijackers are still alive.
If Osama bin Laden didn’t exist, the United States and Britain would have created him. According to the French daily Le Figaro, Bin Laden met with the CIA station chief in Dubai in July 2001. He served the purpose of inciting a bogus “clash of civilizations.” Islamic extremism was initiated by Western intelligence. Islamic terrordoesn’t represent Muslims and is funded by the West and its allies. ISIS is widely regarded as a CIA-Mossad operation.
In conclusion, “covert aggression” has been reborn as false flag terror, and all Westerners are being put in the position of “persecuted” Jews.
See also Makow – “The Zionist Protection Racket”
Alex Jones – Proof Boston Marathon was a False Flag