By now it should be abundantly clear that NASA was created by freemasons and Nazi’s…

… and that Freemasonry and the Nazi’s have a strong connection to the Vatican.

This is further exemplified by some Freemasonic logo’s, such as the flag presented to the 33rd degree Sovereign Grand Commander by Buzz Aldrin (the 2nd man to supposedly step on the moon)…

    
Notice the two-headed eagle on the flag above… no doubt born out of Vatican influence…

Thus, if you really trace the roots of NASA, you see that the people behind the promulgation of the propaganda and narrative about space, gravity, etc… are really the Jesuits and Papacy at the Vatican…

… though that is far from what gets presented to the unsuspecting public!

Are you starting to see the pattern here yet?

Let me spell it out clearly for you…

Click ‘play’ for added dramatic effect…

Given the connection between royal families, freemasons, and the Vatican, we know right from the start that there’s something fishy going on with the Royal Society.

With that in mind, let’s take a look at the Royal Society itself to see what else we can find…

Freemasonry Connection

The Royal Society was founded on 28th November, 1660…

November 28th is the 333rd day of the year (1660 was a leap year) with 33 remaining…
Do you think that choice of date (heavily featuring the number 33) was a coincidence?…
 
To make it abundantly obvious that freemasons were behind the establishment of the Royal Society, let’s take a look at some of the people involved…
Before we do, a quick reminder about freemasonic hand gestures, which were introduced in 5. Links to the Ancients…

Sir Christopher Wren (Founding member & President 1680-1682)

Looking at the historical timeline on the Royal Society website, the first name mentioned is Sir Christopher Wren.

A founding member of the Royal Society, he served as its president between 1680 to 1682.

He was a known freemason, and some sources even claim that he was a Grand Mastermason.

Notice the hand gesture below:

He was best known for building St. Paul’s Cathedral in the City of London after the Great Fire in 1666…

Interesting to note that the Great Fire of London (September 4th, 1666) occurred just a month before Newton discovered Calculus… and Christopher Wren was a great beneficiary as he got to rebuild much of the city…

Needless to say, it certainly seems there was a lot of “restructuring” going on in London in 1666…

King Charles II (Founding Member)

King Charles II was a founding member of the Royal Society, and is listed as a freemason by many sources, such as this.

He’s also flashing the masonic hand-sign in his portrait:

Interesting to note that the second Royal Charter giving the Royal Society its official name was signed by King Charles II on April 23, which is the 113th day of the year, and thus encodes both the freemasonic numbers 13, and 33 (11×3).

Henry Oldenburg (Founding Member and First Secretary)
The third person named by the Royal Society timeline is Henry Oldenburg, the first Secretary of the Royal Society.
Again, notice the hand sign:

Sir Robert Moray (Founding Member & First President)

According to this freemason website, Sir Robert Moray was elected its first president, March 6, 1661 A.D.; he was made a Freemason at Newcastle-on-Tyne on May 20, 1641.


Alexander Bruce (Founding Member)
One of the original 12 founding members, and a known freemason:

Elias Ashmore (Founding Member)
According to this freemasonic website, Elias Ashmore (1617-1698) became a Freemason in 1647, and was a founding member of the Royal Society.

Some other notable freemasons who helped found the Royal Society:

• Robert Boyle (1627-1691) –  Founder of modern Chemistry, son of 1st Earl of Cork (known for Boyle’s Law)
• Christian Huygens (1629-1695) – Dutch mathematician
• John Evelyn (1620-1706) – helped to found the Royal Society; and even has a freemasonic lodge named after him (Lodge 5518)

According to the Freemasonry Museum in London, there have been over 8,000 (!) freemasons in the Royal Society in its history:

That’s an awful lot of freemasons for an organization who’s primary stated purpose is supposed to be primarily scientific, especially considering that they have strict limits on how many members they can have (currently 1,600)!

Clearly, the Royal Society was founded by Freemasons, and has continued to be totally dominated by Freemasons ever since.

Now, you might be getting bored of the history lesson, and be wondering what this has to do with gravity…

Well, would it surprise you that Isaac Newton was a big-time freemason, and an early member of the Royal Society, including serving as its President for 24 years?…

Although definitive information about him being a Freemason are hard to find, Newton’s portraits give him away as a likely freemason:

Isaac Newton (Early member & President 1703-1727)
Although definitive information about him being a freemason are hard to find, Newton’s portraits give him away as a likely freemason:
 
The most interesting part about Newton that very few people are aware of, is that Newton had a keen interest in the occult sciences and religion, which you can read more about here.
Several books have been published outlining some of these details, such as the one below:
      
It’s interesting to note that Newton was born on Christmas Day (December 25th), and died on the vernal equinox (March 20th), which seems like a rather big “coincidence”, given that these are freemasons we are dealing with.
Newton was knighted by the British royals, suggesting he had close ties to the Vatican-influenced monarchs too.
What’s most interesting to note in this regard is that Newton adopted a coat of arms featuring crossed bones immediately after being knighted, as per this interesting article about his sinister background.

Needless to say, that coat of arms is very suspicious give that similar symbols have been used by secret societies like the Skull & Bones, as shown above.

According to this freemasonry website, one of Newton’s closest friends was John Theophilus Desaguliers, who was a Grand Master and is commonly regarded as the “father of the Grand Lodge System“.
In the portrait below he is seen holding a book titled “Constitutions of the Free-Masons 1725” (you can see in better resolution here):

In fact, the wikipedia page on History of Freemasonry even dubs Desaguliers the “father” of modern freemasonry…

In his capacity as President, Newton nominated Desaguliers as Curator of Experiments in 1712, and he would later also became Secretary of the Royal Society.

According to the London Museum of Freemasonry, Desaguliers was both a leading freemason, as well as an important publicist for Newton’s scientific ideas.

Worth noting in the passage above how “Desaguliers insisted that the ritual[s] be remembered rather than written down, leading to a dearth of material on the development of English ritual…“.

So here we have a guy who was

• a close confidant of Newton;
• responsible for publishing Newton’s scientific material; and
• a Grand Master freemason intent on keeping secrets.

Thus, plenty to be suspicious about, given the enormous influence of freemasonry in Newton’s life.

The Bigger Picture

Now, looking at the bigger picture, if you were the Pope sitting on your glorious golden throne at the Vatican, and you wanted to spread some lies to deceive and control the world, then the following would probably be pretty close to a perfect plan…

Firstly, create an official (“royal”) organization that can effectively monopolize what the public believes is “scientifically” true…

Putting the parts in yellow in other words:

• “Promoting science and its benefits“: Publish material that presents only your narratives, whilst censoring out or ridiculing alternative scientific views.

• “Recognizing excellence in science“: Publicly and officially recognize only your own agents/scientists (and ridicule those who disagree).

• “Supporting outstanding science“: Offer funding only to scientists who follow your narrative.

• “Providing scientific advice for policy“: Influence politics and law using your publicly accepted “science” (eg. energy policy…).

• “Fostering international and global cooperation“: Push towards a system where a central government body controls the flow of information (i.e. One World Government).

• “Education and public engagement“: Control the education and publishing sectors to indoctrinate the public with your narrative of history.

Secondly, ensure that no one except those of your choosing are allowed membership to this “official” organization…

… and subsequently promote the work of said scientists over-and-above all else in the “royal” scientific journals, so that their work becomes accepted over time, no matter how ridiculous.

Lastly, ridicule and censor scientists who present material that opposes your chosen narrative.

Over several decades and even centuries, the scientists found in most – if not all – textbooks will most certainly be those of your choosing… as over generations the alternative (truthful) information is blurred and/or lost in time.

Worth noting how all of the most famous “scientists” responsible for shaping the modern day worldview are Freemasons…

Haven’t you ever wondered why a brilliant inventor like Nikola Tesla never shows up in any high school text books, whilst a whole bunch of freemasons who only stole other people’s ideas (eg. Thomas Edison) and spread lies (eg. Newton/Kepler/Copernicus/etc) do appear all the time?

The sad truth is that the vast majority of people who go through school will never think twice about material they are told repeatedly is “obviously” true…

Most people simply swallow whatever lies are published by this “royal” organization as fact, and then go on regurgitating those lies the rest of their lives.

And if anyone questions it, they are mad, because of course the “Royal” Society couldn’t be wrong… could they…

Here’s another coincidence to consider…

• 1660: Royal Society founded by a bunch of freemasons;
• 1663: Royal Society gets its official name via royal charter (by a freemason);
• 1666 (late summer): an apple falls on the head of one of the freemasons;
• 1666 (October): that same freemason invents Calculus;
• 1687: that freemason then goes on to publish “Principia Mathematica” that becomes the bed-rock of “science” for the next 300+ years.

Most people might look at that and think that it’s just a coincidence that the organization responsible for promulgating the gravity story was created just a couple of years before Newton randomly “discovered” gravity…
… However, others (like myself) would look a that and think that the Royal Society was created specifically for the purpose of introducing the public to some grand theories like gravity, that had already been planned well before the apple incident…
Pause and think about this for a second…
What are the odds that a guy just happens to stumble upon (what is considered) the most significant “discovery” of modern science, AND creates a revolutionary form of mathematics, at about the same time that the organization in charge of promulgating said discovery was created… simply by chance?

To summarize these events more clearly…

A bunch of freemasons set up a “Royal” organization to decide what is true and what is not true,…
… that only they and their carefully selected friends can be part of…
…. and then immediately afterwards, these same freemasons just happen to make a string of historic “discoveries” that lay the foundations for science for the next 300 years…

All things considered (with regards to the Vatican and freemasonic influences), without even looking at any actual science, there are already plenty of reasons to doubt the official narrative here!

You’ll be glad to know that this is the end of the history lesson, as we’re now going to close our history textbooks, and instead we’re going to do some science!

Qualifying Note

Before we dive in the cest-pool of modern “science”, allow me to briefly qualify myself in the humble interest of hopefully adding some credibility to the analysis to come.

Below you can see that I have some familiarity with Calculus, as well as Newtonian physics having studied Mechanical Engineering for 4 years…

… which is posted here simply to illustrate that I’m not completely illiterate when it comes to grasping “science”…

Now, please don’t take this as an invitation to blindly follow what I’ve written.

As I’ve stated repeatedly in this blog, you should be questioning everything, including what you read here.

Don’t take my word for anything; but test and research the validity of things for yourself.

Now, insufferable bragging and patronizing advice aside, let’s take a closer look at the G-man’s fruity theory…

2. The Theory of Gravity
In a nutshell (1min), this is what mainstream science teaches:

Let’s pick that apart now shall we…
Isaac Newton
Newton’s law of universal gravitation states the following:

Now in language we can easier understand…

In even simpler terms, mass attracts other mass.

Now, what better way to start de-constructing this fable, than by reading the reservations of Isaac Newton himself, from a 1692 letter (i.e. 5 years after he published Principia Mathematica)…

As you can see above, Newton was clearly very uncomfortable with the idea of “action at a distance” that his equations implied.
In other words, he thought that the idea that a mass could affect another mass at a distance was “absurd“…Moreover, as this passage (from here) makes clear, Newton also admitted that he had no idea what was causing gravity…

So, despite the fact that Newton had absolutely no idea what caused gravity, he defined his equations as “laws” simply because they worked for the (heliocentric) model he was working with…In other words,“If the Earth is a spinning ball……..
* 3 volumes and a new invented form of mathematics later*
……… then these gravitational equations must be true.”
So basically, the entire premise that holds the spinning globe together (i.e. gravity), is based on nothing more than one man’s imagination and assumptions, rather than on any actual scientific experiments…
Allow me to point out, that this is the very definition of…

Why don’t we let “super-scientist” Michio Kaku summarize this for us…

Allow me to point out that to this day, “gravity” is still strictly speaking known as the “theory of gravity”…
This is because gravity itself has never actually been proven…

In other words, the theory of gravity is a “supposition of ideas intended to explain [gravitation], and is “based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained”.Put simply, Newton assumed that the world was a ball, and invented some maths to suit that narrative…

… which of course is exactly how Nikola Tesla described “mainstream” scientists like Newton…

For those who don’t know, Nikola Tesla was one of those rare scientists who actually used experiments and the scientific method to figure out how things in nature worked, rather than inventing wild theories based on his own imagination.

Tesla is often cited as the “inventor of the electrical age”, but he has been heavily suppressed from history books, for reasons that will become clear later on in this post and in the next post.

Understandably, Tesla wasn’t the only notable person to question Newton’s ridiculous ideas…

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749 – 1832) was a German writer and scientist, most famous for his work involving colour theory – an area in which Newton himself also did some work in his later years.

This is what Goethe thought of Newton, as well as the scientific field in general at the time:

Moreover, just like Tesla, Goethe also pointed out that Newton liked to trust his fancy equations over his senses…

Now, despite the fact that Newton’s ideas had no scientific backbone whatsoever, his theory has nonetheless become accepted and taught in the mainstream as scientific fact…

For starters, here is what modern (pseudo-) scientists tell us about Gravity:

As you can see above, “gravity” is treated by mainstream science as being a “naturalphenomenon by which things with all things with mass [attract each other]”…

…. that “gives weight to physical objects”, and…
…. that is “responsible for many of the large scale structures in the Universe”…

As you’ve seen until now, there is literally NOTHING that suggests that any of that is true. It is all speculation, based on Newton’s assumptions!

Not surprisingly, there are many theoretical and observational inconsistencies with the theory – even within the mainstream model for which gravity is supposed to be a “law”…

Here are just a few examples of “theoretical concerns” that remain unresolved to this day…

All in all, Newton’s theory can be summarized by this short passage, borrowed from here:

Despite being commonly referred to as a force, Newton himself realized the absurdity of instantaneous action at a distance and infinite force propagation.

His equation for universal gravitation being proportional to mass and inversely proportional to distance fell short in certain instances and did not fully describe observation.

Although being a close approximation mathematically and a marvel of it’s time, gravity as a force was flawed.

Despite these obvious flaws, Newton’s theories steadily grew to be accepted into mainstream science…
… no doubt aided by the perpetuation of pathetic propaganda like this…

The rise of science through the industrial revolution enabled more and more scientists to conduct experiments to try to prove the validity of gravity and the heliocentric* model…

(*heliocentricism = the model of the solar system with the sun at the center)

…But as it happens, all such attempts to prove heliocentricism failed… and to cover this up, Relativity was invented…

Before digging into the absurdity of Relativity though, we’re going to look at some of the most important experiments that forced the establishment to invent it.

Please bear with me – as this information is included here for the sake of adequately setting the scene for the Theory of Relativity… as well as giving you some more concrete scientific evidence that the Earth spin is completely unmeasurable (i.e. fabricated).

Scientific Experiments that Disproved Heliocentricism

“Every experiment ever designed to detect the motion of the earth has failed to detect earth’s motion and/or distinguish it from relative counter motion of the universe.”
-Mark Wyatt, Author of “Is Geocentricism Possible?“

Mickelson Morley (1887)

The 1887 Michelson-Morley experiment aimed to measure the change in speed of light due to the (supposed) motion of Earth through space.

They aimed to do this by separating a light beam, and mirroring it back onto a light detector off two mirrors at right angles to each other.

Their experiments included measurements taken in every different direction, as well as experiments on numerous locations on the Earth’s surface…

… but no matter how hard they tried they couldn’t detect any change in the velocity of the two light beams whatsoever… (and certainly not a 1036mph spin of the Earth)…

This text sums up the aftermath of these experiments well:

They thought that their experiment was a complete “failure”, they could find no evidence that the Earth was moving at all. Something was radically wrong. Michelson tried experiment after experiment for the rest of his life and could find no evidence that the Earth was moving relative to an aether or to space.

This sent the physicists into a quandary, Michelson thought his experiments were all failures – what was he doing wrong?? How could he detect the Earth’s motion. Michelson thought maybe the Earth dragged the aether along with it but a later experiment proved that this was not the case. Other scientists also tried various experiments and all failed. Or did they??
George Fitzgerald, an Irish physicist, came up with the adhoc explanation that, as the Earth sailed through the heavens it “contracted” in the direction it was going just enough to compensate for its forward motion (how convenient!). Hendrik Lorentz, a dutch physicist, had the same idea but he put it down as mathematical equations that became known as the Lorentz transformations. Einstein liked these equations so much that he used them in his “Theory of Special Relativity”.

Most scientists know about the Michelson-Morley experiment – that failed to detect any movement of the earth round the sun. This had to be overcome so the Fitzgerald-Lorentz shortening of the apparatus was proposed, and eventually the paradoxical Relativity Theory was invented by Einstein to overcome this problem.

However, there are three other experiments that have been deliberately ignored by universities because they support geocentricity. 

(The text above and the next 3 examples are taken from here)
Mickelson-Gale (1925)
The Michelson-Gale experiment detected the aether passing the surface of the earth with an accuracy of 2% of the speed of the daily rotation of the earth!

Thus, the Michelson-Morely experiment (outlined above) detected no movement of the earth around the sun, yet the Michelson-Gale experiment measured the earth’s rotation (or the aether’s rotation around the earth!) to within 2%! This surely speaks volumes for geocentricity. (Reference – Astrophysical Journal 1925 v 61 pp 140-5)

George Biddell Airy, “Airy’s Failure” (1871)
Telescopes have to be very slightly tilted to get the starlight going down the axis of the tube because of the earth’s “speed around the sun”. Airey filled a telescope with water that greatly slowed down the speed of the light inside the telescope and found that he did not have to change the angle of the telescope. This showed that the starlight was already coming in at the correct angle so that no change was needed.

This demonstrated that it was the stars moving relative to a stationary earth and not the fast orbiting earth moving relative to the comparatively stationary stars. If it was the telescope moving he would have had to change the angle.
(Reference – Proc. Roy. Soc. London v 20 p 35)

Here is an excellent 6min animated video on Airy’s failure for any geeks who want to learn more.
The Sagnac Experiment (1913)

Sagnac rotated a table complete with light and mirrors with the light being passed in opposite directions around the table between the mirrors.

He detected the movement of the table by the movement of the interference fringes on the target where they were recombined.

This proved that there IS an aether that the light has to pass through and this completely destroys Einstein’s theory of Relativity that says there is no aether.

It is for this reason that this experiment is completely ignored by scientists. More recently Kantor has found the same result with similar apparatus. (Reference – Comptes Rendus 1913 v157 p 708-710 and 1410-3)

Aether is going to come up again later on in this post, and again in the next post, so to get a basic understanding of how it was proved to exist I’d recommend watching this short video that does an excellent job of explaining Sagnac’s experiment, even for non-technical viewers: