Why is the flat earth topic attracting so much attention and so much disinformation? Is it, as I’ve been repeatedly told, just a “red herring”, a distraction from “real” and important issues facing us like chemtrails, GMO food, radiation, vaccines, the New World Order and Agenda 21? Certainly there are real distractions designed for just that reason, but when it comes to the flat earth model, we are not talking about an issue, but rather the very nature of who we are, where we are, the nature of our very existence in the world and our very identity. Flat earth then, is a core, existential topic. When you start to look into the history of the globe model, you see that its acceptance has been several centuries in the making, culminating in Hollywood’s mass indoctrination of the existence of a vast “outer space”. Without the globe, the theory of evolution would fall flat on it’s face along with all the lies dependent upon it. If the globe model is false, then it may just be the biggest lie that has been perpetuated on society, right after “You shall not surely die…but you shall be like God..” Gen 3:4 If untrue, those behind the globe model are trying to hide God.

We’ve been so inundated with the concept of the globe model that it seems outrageous to us to consider the flat earth as a possibility. Before drawing your conclusions about Flat Earth, I hope you’ll take the time to read this post and others by Richard Kallberg on Narrow Gate Web and critically think it through. Richard is doing an excellent job of systematically revealing the many fallacies that are ubiquitously being accepted as “science” today (and with a sense of humor, something we all could use more of these days!) Truth is so simple a child can see it. We’ve been taught to rely on “experts”, but even scientists have fields they specialize in. Many accept these truths unquestioningly because they are focused in their own area of expertise.

You can find articles on this site showing the occult, kabbalist origins of historical (as opposed to observational) science.

Narrow Gate Web | Richard Kallberg

The aim of this post is to present an accurate and comprehensive picture of what the stars are and how they move in the night sky, as simple observation tells us that they are notat all what NASA tell us that they are.

It is also my hope that this post may inspire you to look upon the night sky with new eyes and with renewed child-like curiosity.

Note to new readers:

If you are new to this blog, please note that this is article #27 in a series of articles that have been presented as a chronological and logical narrative.

That being the case, you may find it useful to read from the start (follow the links in the header above), or to at least check out the Table of Contents page for a “spark-notes” summary of previous material discussed in this blog, before continuing here.

This post will pick up where we left off in 24. Made in a Hollywood Basement as we will seek to answer the following question:

If outer space is a myth, what then, are the stars that we see in the night sky?

This post will be very visual,and will feature numerous videos that will assist in clearly illustrating many of the things that will be discussed, as words alone cannot do enough justice to certain elements of what we’ll discuss.

Some of the videos are slightly longer than the videos you will usually find in this blog, but do note that each one has been carefully selected for your viewing pleasure and to illustrate certain points as accurately and as thoroughly as possible.

As you can see in the Table of Contents below,we will start our journey through the stars by deconstructing some of the lies we’ve been told about stars.

We’ll then look at what the stars actually are, before analyzing the movement of the stars in the night sky for further clues about what is going on in the sky above us.

Introduction

What We’ve Been Told
- The Sun
- Gravity
- Thermonuclear Fusion
The Real Stars
- What Stars Actually Look Like
- Frequency of the Heavens
Parallax
- An Advanced Course in Pseudoscience
- The Missing Parallax
Star Trails
- Introduction to Star Trails
- Star Trails vsThe Spinning Globe
- Star Trails Explained: Part 1
The Astrolabe
- Introduction to the Astrolabe
- Geo-metry
- The Nautical Mile
The Astroplate
- Dome Reflection
- Star Trails Explained: Part 2

Introduction

Have you ever just sat and dreamily looked up at the stars?

Chances are, if you’re below the age of 30, you’ve spent more time doing this…

… than this:

With that in mind, what do most of usreally know about the stars beyond what we’ve been told?

Ironically, one of the pseudoscientists onwho’s account wehave shared a few laughs in earlier posts perhaps said it best:

What do you say then, shall we un-bamboozle ourselves and check out the Universe as it really is?…

1. What We’ve Been Told

To begin, let’s do a step-by-step deconstruction ofwhat we’re toldthat the stars are…

The Sun

To start with, here is the Google definition of a star:

Now, do you really think that the Sun looks anything like the stars in the night sky?

Keep it mind what we learned in19. What Goes Around, Comes Around… that is,that the sun is certainly not a ridiculous 93 ~~million~~ gazillion miles away…

This is what wikipedia says about stars…

So, despite the fact that the sun and stars look nothing alike to the naked eye, we’retold that the sun is a star…
… and what’s more, we’re told that it is a “luminous sphere of plasma” that looks like this…

An Erupting Prominence.
Prominences are huge clouds of relatively cool, dense plasma suspended in the Suns hot, thin corona. Like this large, twirling prominence, they can sometimes erupt and escape the Suns atmosphere.
SOHO, January 18, 2000

However,any five year old with eyes will tell you that the picture of the “sun” presented to us by NASA looks nothing like the sun that we actually see in the sky:

Needless to say, the sun is quite obviously not a gigantic exploding fireball!

We will cover what is most likely going on with the sunin a laterpost, but for now we willkeep ourfocus on the stars themselves.

What’s important to note here, is that the sun and stars are different from one another – as we can clearly observe with our own eyes.

Gravity

As they do with everything else, “science” tells us that what holds the starstogether here is the magical force called “gravity”…

Going back to what we learned in23. Destined for Oblivion,this is quite simply just another example of where “gravity” is used as the defacto explanation for how something works…
… just as it is used to explain

How the Earth can orbit the sun;
How the moon can orbit the Earth without drifting off into space;
How satellites the size of a school bus can levitatein mid-air above our atmosphere without falling down;
How 321,000,000 cubic miles of seawater can stick to a spinning ball whilst letting a helium balloon float upwards;
How water can curve around, and stick to, a spinning ball (despite the fact that water always finds its level);
Why we don’t fly off when the ball spins;
Why people and water can stick to the underside of a ball;
etc… etc… etc…

If anyone reading this still believes in “gravity”, please read 23. Destined for Oblivion, which thoroughly deconstructs the gravity myth, and also exposes the connections between the Vatican and freemasonry and the Royal Society – where the gravity myth originated.

For the purpose of eliminating the myth that gravity is responsible for stars,it might be useful to remember what Isaac Newton himself thought about gravity and action-at-a-distance…

Long story short, “gravity” is clearly the gift that keeps on giving for the freemasonic liars… despite being based solely on imagination and fancy equations that bear no relation to reality.

And speaking of things that bear no relation to reality…

Thermonuclear Fusion

This is what pseudo-scientists tell us about what makes stars appear bright in the sky:

Here’s a colourful illustration, courtesy of NASA…

In other words…

If the sun really is as far away (93 million miles) and as hot (15 million°C)as they say it is, then who in their right mind would ever claim to know what the inside of it was made of?

… That is, unless of course astronauts are fire-proof and have themselves been to their exploding sun to check…

You should be well-versed in NASA’s lies by now, but here is another one… this one about how stars form, taken from NASA’s website:

Here’s a short summary of how stars are “born” according to pseudoscientists:

In other words…

A huge cloud (that none of us have never seen before)…
… somehow collapses in on itself (in a way nobody has ever replicated on Earth)…
… because of “gravity” (which nobody has ever proven to exist, as shown in 23. Destined for Oblivion)…
… and it becomes hotter (which nobody has ever measured)…
… and nuclear reactions (which we have no way of verifying) take place…

… and voilá, a star is born…

The best part is, NASA even have some amazing footage of stars to support their amazing science…
… like this footage of an exploding star (1 min)…

… and here is a quick 1 min video taken from the NASA Goddard YouTube channel which shows what a black hole “shredding” a passing star supposedly looks like…

The main take-away from this section, is that what we’re told about stars is a complete lie, based on nothing more than CGI and pseudoscience.

Before we move on, here’s a quick 3 min video showing NASA ~~astronauts~~ actors clearly contradicting themselves with regards to whether or not it’s possible to see stars in outer space…

Now, let’s move on to another aspect concerning the stars that annihilates the accepted worldview of the stars…

2.The Reality of the Stars

What Stars Actually Look Like

First, to remind you, this is a “photo” of what NASA wants you to believe is a star:

… but what do we actually see if we look at the stars in the sky with a telescope or camera?…

Take a look at this 8 min video… and decide for yourself if what you are seeing are giant spheres of gas billions of light years away… or if they look more like something… magnetic…

As you can see, what we see in the sky has absolutely no relation to the sun… nor to what NASA tell us the stars look like…

Here are some still shots for your reference (though as you can see they don’t really do justice to what we see in videos)…

For those who want to see more videos of the stars, you can find hundreds of videos of the stars on YouTube that will show the same thing as in the video above… here are just a few examples…

Now, some might say that all the videos of stars on YouTube are fake or photoshopped… which is a reasonable claim to make.

To check to see if what those videos were showing is accurate I checked for myself using my own telescope and a camera… and whatI’ve personally seen is that the videos above show an accurate picture of the stars.
I didn’t manage to capture great footage to do justice to the stars (due to my limited camera skills and lack of a tripod), but despite the poor quality, my videos do show enough to show that what you can see in the video above is real.

For reference my videos are in this playlist, but remember what I’ve said about quality.

Below is a photo I took of a random star. The picture obviously isn’t an accurate depiction of the shape of the star due to the exposure and lack of a tripod, but none the less you can clearly see the amazing array of colours this star exhibits.

If you pay close attention to the stars in the night sky you can even notice certain stars changing colours as they twinkle – even with your naked eye!
The star Sirius is especially bright and colourful for example.

Anyways, now that we’ve seen what the stars look like, let’s take a look at howthe stars appear the way they do…

Frequency of the Heavens

As you will come to understand in the videos below, the stars seem to appear the way they do due to several scientific phenomena, namely:

Cymatics – the study of how sound affects matter.

Sonoluminescence– the emission of short bursts of light from imploding bubbles in a liquid when excited by sound.

Superconductivity– a phenomenon of exactly zero electrical resistance and expulsion of magnetic flux fields occurring in certain materials when cooled below a characteristic critical temperature.

Quantum levitation – a phenomena relating to equilibrium whereby a superconductor in a magnetic field will expel a magnetic field inside of it, and thus bend the magnetic field around it.

This probably sounds like a bunch of big complex words, but rest assured that we aren’t going to be covering any complex equations here.

The main thing to note in this section – is that everything relates to two things: SOUND and MAGNETISM.

It is by no means required, but you may find that you get more out of the content below after reading the following blog posts which introduced the principles of cymatics and magnetism:

1. Secrets of Cymatics, DNA, and Egyptians, which introduces the subject of Cymatics and shows some interesting connections to Nikola Tesla, DNA, and the Giza Pyramids.

13. Magnetism: Tesla’s Key to the Universe– a study of Ed Liedskalnin’s magnetic motor at Coral Castle, as well as the naturally-occuring magnetic principles it is based on.

14. Crop Circles and Ancient Power Plants– an article exposing the phenomenal amount of magnetic power found in nature, that both Nikola Tesla and ancient cultures knew about.

Now, instead of boring you with long and drawn-out scientific explanations about the sciences listed above, I will leave you to watch the three videos below, which will graphically explain the science behind the stars more colorfully than any words can…

A 5min video showing you what sonoluminescence and cymatics are:

This15min video illustrates the connection between what the stars look like and cymatic frequencies:

This18min video illustrates the principles of superconductivity and quantum levitation in relation to sonoluminescence:

Hopefully the videos above have sparked some curiosity and given you a grasp of what the stars are.

If you want to see more on any of the subjects discussed I recommend doing a keyword search for “cymatics stars” or “sonoluminescence stars” on YouTube, as there are plenty of awesome videos on these subjects.

We will look more at the stars themselves in another post, but for the rest of this postwe will be studyingtheirmovement, starting with adeconstruction ofanother one of NASA’s lies: Parallax.

3. Parallax

Note that this section might get a little technical, but don’t be put off if you don’t immediately understand, as there are a couple of short videos a little further down thatwill probably make more sense than the text here.

An Advanced Coursein Pseudoscience

Let’s first define what this is:

To give you a better idea, below is an animated example of parallax, borrowed from wikipedia.
As the viewpoint moves side to side, the objects in the distance appear to move more slowly than the objects close to the camera.

Here is how wikipediadescribes parallax:

Below is a simplified illustration of the parallax of an object against a distant background due to a perspective shift.
When viewed from “Viewpoint A”, the object appears to be in front of the blue square. When the viewpoint is changed to “Viewpoint B”, the object appears to have moved in front of the red square.

“Scientists” and modern “astronomers” claim that they can use parallax to measure distances between stars…

If onedoes a google image search for “parallax” what appears isa mountain of images like the one above…

In other words, nice pictures, but nothing that has any substance…

This is also what we find on two NASA websites when searching for “NASA parallax”…

This tells us absolutely nothing practical, sothen we do a google search to try to find a more detailedexplaination for parallax…
… and what we find is this “advanced” course:

http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys440/lectures/helio_para/helio_para.html

The site teachessome basic trigonometry, and other mathematical equations – butagain, nothing practical in terms of measuring actual stars in the sky…

It turns out that after teachingthis “advanced” mathematics … we are presented with this conclusion… or “The bottom line” as they call it.

Here is this text magnified a bit for those who don’t have the eye-sight of a hawk:

Do you see what just happened?

After all that complex maths stuff, we’re told that a magical satellite has mapped out the distances for us…

In other words… “Advanced” courses like this one teach complex maths that can verify the numbers provided by scientists, but they don’t teach how to verify those distances by actually looking at the stars…

Needless to say, the numbers provided to us have absolutely nothing to do with reality!

The truth is that you personally have no way of measuring the distances they’ve told you…

… but fortunately “a large team of scientists” have done all the hard work for you…

So let me see if I got this right…

“Scientists” put a tin can called Hipparcos (pictured below) into space, and it somehow mapped out the precise position of 118,200 stars…
… and we’re all supposed to trust all of these distances because we’ve been given some fancy equations…

Clearly, parallax is yet another example ofpseudoscience that has no bearing on reality…

For an excellent study on how astronomers could be so wrong, check out this article:

https://aplanetruth.info/2016/12/10/how-did-the-kings-of-astronomy-get-it-so-wrong-part-i-copernicus-newton/

The Missing Parallax

Clearly, apart from the fact that we have no way of verifying the distances we’re given (which are usually in the billions and billions of light years…), why do parallax equations have no relation to reality?

Well, if the Earth is

spinning at over 1,000mph;
orbiting the sun at 66,600mph; and
moving with the solar system at 483,000mph

… then the logical question to ask is this:

Quick Tangent

Those who have read 26. Gematria, Synchronicity, and Predictive Programming will appreciate the significance of the name of the satellite that maps the distances we’re given – “hipparcos”, and “parallax” in gematria…

Back to the stars though…

This is a useful 1 min video to watch to visualize the problem with “parallax”…
(Note: You might want to turn your volume down as the music is quite heavy!)

The simple fact is that parallax has never been observed between the stars, as they all move in unison, as you can see in this gif:

Now then, if the stars are moving in unison, what conclusion can we make?…

Hmm…

If all the stars are moving in unison,… could it be that they are all spinning together at the same height or as part of the same structure?…

…Perhaps a little something like this:

The animationabove is made from this4min video, whichincludes some useful animations of the stars and movement of the sun and moon, and it’ll also introduce ournext sub-topic: star trails…

4. Star Trails

The movement of the starsis undoubtedly one of thetrickiest elementsto figure out with regards to the Flat Earth, so please bear with me in the next 3 sections as things might not be clear until you get the full view of things by the end.

Introduction to Star Trails

As usual, the definition first:

Here’s a particularly resplendentstar trail photograph captured in Indonesia earlier this month, as presented on theBBC:

Now, the reason why this is a tricky one to figure out is becausethe stars in the Northern “hemisphere” and Southern “hemisphere” appear to be spinning in opposite directions…

The opposing spins is illustrated by the time-lapse photograph of the stars in the night sky at the equator (looking East) below, which shows:

half of thestars appear to betravellinganti-clockwise (those north of the equator), and
half of them appear to be travelling clockwise (those south of the equator)…

Note that this perfect symmetryonly happens at the equator.

To help visualize this better, here is atime-lapse video showing the star trails at the equator.

Now, at first glance,thefact that the stars appear to spin in different directionsin the northern “hemisphere” compared with the southern “hemisphere” suggests that the model below is totally wrong… given that everything is spinning in the same direction here:

I guess the globe is right then… because it can (supposedly) explain why the stars appear to spin in opposite directions from the viewers perspective…

Hang on a second, let’s think about this in a bit more depth instead of just accepting the first solution presented to us by the clowns shall we…

Star Trails vs The Spinning Globe

There are many problems with the spinning globe modelrelating to how the stars move.
To start off, here are some interesting pointsfrom the video shown earlier (the one at the end of section 3):

In other words…

If this is how the Earth behaves…

… then that begs the question:

Another couple of related questions:

You may have noticed the figure “2 quadrillion” mentioned above regarding the distance to Polaris…
Let’s put that ina bit ofperspective…

433.8 “light years” to miles / kilometers:

The e+15 means that you multiply that number by 10 to the power of 15… which as shown in this table is called a “quadrillion”…

Quadrillion is equivalent to “a thousand trillion”… or “a million billion”…

Now, if stars are a quadrillion billion zillion gazillion miles away, do you really think it makes sense that people can use a simple handheld camera to take pictures of them?

Clearly, anything that is even beyond the reach of Carl Sagan’s imagination is not something anyone can take pictures of with a camera.

Furthermore, if the distance to Polaris is that great, even the slightest change of angle due to the motion or rotation of the Earth would make Polaris move out of it’s position directly above the North pole…

If you want to do a simple experiment to visualize this,take a laser pointer and hold it on a basketball shining perpendicular to the surface of the ball, and shine it at a specific point on the wall – with that point representing Polaris.

Now turn or move the ball in any direction… and you will see that the laser pointer does not point at the “Polaris” point on the wall anymore.

Now imagine that that basketball is Earth, and it is spinning at 1,036mph, moving at 66,600mph around the sun, which is moving at 483,000mph…

The 7 min clip in this video will illustrate this problem with parallax very clearly:

Now, are we really supposed to believe that Polaris has managed to stay in the same position for thousands of years – as evidenced by consistent navigation techniques throughout history that still work today, all whilst the Earth has moved trillions of miles in that time span?

Here’s another anomaly to think about…

Here is a related question:

Despite these gigantic oversights, the priests of science will tell you that the star trails do work on a globe…

Here is a typical explanation that you’ll see that supposedly “proves”the globe model:

This is all very well and good…

… Except for the fact that it only accounts for the spin of the Earth itself… and doesn’t even begin to account for the Earth’s supposed movement of 66,600 mph around the sun, which is itself moving at 483,000mph…

Needless to say, if the globe model was correct, we wouldn’t see perfectly circular star trails, but instead streaks more akin to the image shown below,given that the velocities of 483,000 mph and 66,600 mph far surpass the 1,036 mph spin of the Earth.

Clearly, the globe model doesn’t make any sense whatsoever when we scrutinize what we see in the night sky.

Furthermore, along with the lack ofvisible evidence of the Earth moving, we don’t even feel any any of these motions… (as we went through in 20. You Spin Me Right Round Baby)…

… But of course, the Earth is so big so we don’t feel anything right?

Here’s another example of disinformation on this subject:

The smarty-pants who made the illustration above has cleverly omitted the fact that the observatories’ telescopes can change vertical viewing angle and don’t have a default elevation angle that is constricted by their latitudinal location… but sadly there are probably people who fall for this…

To summarize this section, here isan excellent reality checker that spells out thesituation with the star trails vs the globe clearly (along with one or two otherthings)…

Star Trails Explained: Part 1

This section will start to explain how the stars can appear to be moving the way they are in the night sky, though the material in Star Trails Explained: Part 2 (which will come in Section 6 below) will provide the full picture.

For starters, this11minclip provides a useful study of the way the stars move. Some of the graphics you will see in this video are shown below this video.

Note that perspective as described here isn’t the entire answer for star trails, but is useful for understanding star trails nonetheless… (more on this in section 6 below).

If things don’t immediately make sense it may be useful to refer to the explanation on how perspective works in 18. Look Around, It Will Astound You.

This 2 min video might help with visualizing what is going on as well, as it shows how the same effect seen in star trails in the domed night sky can be replicated on a reflective glass bowl….

There is another fascinating aspect to the stars relating to the star trails that we will look at in section 6, but before we look at that let’s take a look at an incredible tool that has largely been forgotten… the Astrolabe.

5. The Astrolabe

Introduction to the Astrolabe

If you were paying close attention a bit earlier, you mayhave noticed that theman in the picture shown earlier is holding a curious object…

This device is known as an astrolabe…

An astroplate is constructed using several flat discs, which you can read more about here…

Back in the day, people were far better educated about the sky objects and the relationship between time and their location than they are today, and many people would have been experts in the use of the astrolabe…

This 2 min video will give you some basic insight into how an astrolabe works:

Geo-metry

Astrolabesare designed by people who have a very advanced knowledge of astronomy and geometry, though today there are very few people who have this knowledge…

The reason why so few have this amazing knowledge may be because of changes in how geometry has been studied and taught by our illustrious ~~educational~~ indoctrination institutions…

For example – to borrow some ideas from this video, here is how wikipedia depicts geometry in the 15th century and the 20th century:

Do you notice anydifference between the two pictures?

… Like perhaps how geometer’s back in the day used to work outdoors(where they could point things at the sky),…
… and how “modern” geometer’swork exclusivelyindoors (where there is no sky)…

This seems rather absurd when you consider thatthe root words for geometry are “geo,meaning “earth“, and “metron“, meaning “measurement“!

Surely you need to be outdoors to “measure” the “earth” right?!

… But I suppose that we now have fancy blackboard equations and iPhones which can spoon-feed us everything we need to know, so nobody really needs to go outdoors to discover what is actually going on anymore…

Geometry was effectively switched from a system connecting the measurement of real world locations and time… to being a totally abstract spatial science studied exclusively on blackboards indoors…

This is why nobody even blinks when shown “projections” like those below, which are supposed to “explain” how the astrolabe can work in relation to a spherical sky –but which make no absolutely practical sense in the real world…

… because nobody has a clue what is actually going on outside anymore…

https://christianobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/27-the-stars-declare-the-truth/sphere1-2/”>

Most people today like to think that our ancestors up to 500 years ago were primitive idiots for thinking that the Earth was flat,…

… when the truth is that our ancestors designed tools like the astrolabe based entirely on their meticulous studies of nature and the stars.

That’s quite a contrast compared to our “modern” day, where most peopleget their understanding of nature from what they had been toldin their textbooks and seen on television!

When you really look into this subject, it’s becomes astonishing that people were able to understand the stars so precisely so as to design the astrolabe – a truly magnificent tool thathas hundredsof uses, a few of which are listedhere:

Below is an interesting 9min video of a TEDx talkabout the astrolabe.

What is particularly amusing is that the speaker is obliged to tellthe audience that this device is compatible with a globemodel…though as is painfully obvious it makes absolutely no sense with a globe…

Another interesting point to note with regards to the astrolabe is the distance measurement on it – the nautical mile…

The Nautical Mile

In essence, the nautical mile isdefined as the distance spanned by one minute of arc along a meridian of the Earth (north-south), as you can visualize here:

A nautical mile used to be a minute of arc North-South – that is, one60th of a degree…
Despite the fact that the nautical mile worked perfectly for centuries, the “Clarke Spheroid” model was introduced in 1866 which meant that a degree of North-South was no longer a simple length but varied at different latitudes… as mentioned on Wikipedia:

You don’t need to be a genius to figure out that if something works perfectly you don’t change it… unless of course you have other agenda’s…

So basically, when “scientists” introduced the sphere lie they had to tell all the people who had successfully navigated by sea using the nautical mile that the physical basis of their measurement unit had been wrong all this time… even though they had successfully navigated the world using it for centuries!

The funniest part is, that despite telling the world that the world is a sphere and that the nautical mile is wrong, the nautical mile is still to this day used for both air and marine navigation…

To state the obvious… if the Earth actually was a globe, don’t you think they’d be using navigational principles to navigate that are based on a sphere rather than a flat plane?

So to summarize…

Much like the sundial and the moon-dial, the astrolabe is comprised of flat circular discs and has worked perfectly all throughout history – and continues to be used to this day for navigation.

A good understanding of the astrolabe tells usthatthe Sun and the Moon share the same path on a flat plane in the sky… and that the star system is also moving in a flat plane above us… just as a planisphere suggests…

The Vedic (ancient Indian) astronomical modelpresents the celestial bodies as travelling on flat planes, as shown in this short 1:30 clip:

And on that bombshell, allow me to introduce you to the astroplate

6. Astroplate

The astroplate mightbe a bit tricky to understand, so before we get into what the astroplate is, let meremind you of somethingwe covered in19. What Goes Around, Comes Around…

Dome Reflection

Primarily, recall that the dome above us is a reflective surface, as evidenced by…

Rainbows – which can only be replicated indoors with a light source and a curved reflective surface,as discussed inthis video.

2. Sun dogs, which are light effects due to reflection:

3. “Double-suns“, which show that the sun is reflecting off something:

https://christianobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/19-what-goes-around-comes-around/a1-4/”>

4. Sunlight coverage throughout the year – including the 24hr sun in Antarctica, which shows that sunlight is reflecting off a domed surface to distribute the way it does:

Note that the sunlight coverage perfectly matches what we see in terms of sunrise and sunset times throughout the year:

Here’s a useful visual so that you can see the shape of the sunlight coverage relating to the shape of the dome:

Also recall from earlier that the stars spin anti-clockwise in the northern “hemisphere”, and clockwise in the southern “hemisphere”…

Here’s the star trails at the equator again for your reference:

Now then, what conclusions can we draw from the fact that the dome is reflective, and that the stars appear to be spinning in opposite directions in the northern and southern hemispheres?

Well, the logical conclusion here is that the stars are being reflected on the dome as well

It’s okay if you’re thinking this sounds a bit confusing…

… but perhaps this 3min video will start toclarify this…

Star Trails Explained: Part 2

The video above explains the general structure of the astroplateand the basics of reflection.

However, that animation doesn’t really show exactly howthe opposite star spins in the northern and southern “hemispheres” works…

To better understand how thereflectionworks,take a look at the 4min video below which does a good job of replicating the star spin in a home-made setup.

The setup might looksomewhat rudimentary, but it is very effective in illustrating how the opposite star spins occur, so don’t be put off just because it doesn’t involve advanced CGI and animations.

Also, let this be a reminder that real science is observable, measurable, and repeatable – even in your own living room!

In case you want to see more on the astroplate I highly recommend
that you exploretheYouTube channel Alternative Cosmologywhich has many more videos explaining how the astroplate works.

For example, here is another (15min) video from that channelthatbuilds on what you’ve seen aboveand providesadditionaluseful information about the astroplate:

This is probably more than enough information to keep your mind spinning in multiple directions for now, so we’ll leave it there.

Our study of the stars is by no means done though, so we’ll continue our look at the stars – and planets –in another post, when things will start to get really interesting!

Conclusion

To round things off, here’s a quick summary of what we’ve looked at in this post:

To start, we saw that the sun is not a star, and that the stars are not at all what we’ve been told.

You were then shown somevideos involving cymatics, sonoluminescence, superconductivity, and quantum levitation, which go a long way to explaining what we are seeing in the sky.

We then moved on to deconstructing the parallax lie, before taking a dreamy look at star trails and the amazing astrolabe, which led us to study the astroplate.

In other words, a lot of awesome stuff that proves that we’ve been lied to about the stars.

This post has shone plenty of light on the lies we’ve been fed by these guys…

… but what you’veseen so far doesn’t even scratch the surface of the knowledge being hidden from you.
Rest assured though, we’re going to beslicingthrough many more of their lies and hidden knowledge like a hot knife cutting through butter,so stay tuned!

To end this post, I will leave you with this 4min video which inspired the title of this post, and which mightgive you something deepto think aboutuntil the next post…